AKA vs DIBS: stock comparison and AI forecast
A.K.A. Brands Holding Corp. (AKA) and 1stdibs.Com, Inc. (DIBS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
AKA A.K.A. Brands Holding Corp.
- Price
- $10.00 -9.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $110M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
DIBS 1stdibs.Com, Inc.
- Price
- $6.04 +35.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $203M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- DIBS is 1.8 times larger than AKA by market capitalization ($203M against $110M).
- Over the last six months DIBS returned +35.4% and AKA -9.0%.
- AKA turns -4.8% of its revenue into net income, against -6.0% for DIBS.
- AKA carries 3.73 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.53 times for DIBS.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Catalog & Mail-Order Houses.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $110M | $203M |
| P/B Ratio | 1.22x | 2.76x |
| EPS | $-2.83 | $-0.32 |
| Book Value/Share | $8.21 | $2.19 |
| Revenue/Share | $56.21 | $2.73 |
| FCF/Share | $0.12 | $0.07 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -32.7% | -7.5% |
| ROA | -6.9% | -4.9% |
| ROIC | -5.9% | -11.8% |
| Gross Margin | 59.8% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.9% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | -4.8% | -6.0% |
| EBT Margin | -4.5% | -5.9% |
| Tax Rate | -5.4% | -1.5% |
Financial Health
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.06x | 3.06x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.31x | – |
| D/E Ratio | 3.73x | 0.53x |
| Financial Leverage | 4.73x | 1.53x |
| Interest Coverage | -2.0x | -3299.3x |
| Working Capital | $8M | $58M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $18M | $4M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1M | $2M |
| Capital Spending | -$17M | -$2M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -17.8% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | -75.7% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 0.2% | 2.5% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.7% | 1.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.45x | 0.81x |
| Receivables Turnover | 65.9x | 126.2x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.6x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 14.1x | 36.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 6 days | 3 days |
| Days Inventory | 140 days | – |
| Payables Period | 75 days | 14 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 71 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $618M | $92M |
| Operating Income | -$18M | -$10M |
| Net Income | -$30M | -$5M |
| R&D Expense | – | $25M |
| SG&A Expense | $308M | $71M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $248M | $24M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | AKA | DIBS |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 11M | 34M |
AKA vs DIBS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, AKA or DIBS?
DIBS is 1.8 times larger than AKA by market capitalization ($203M against $110M).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, AKA or DIBS?
Over the last six months DIBS returned +35.4% and AKA -9.0%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, AKA or DIBS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.