APT vs MLSS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) and Milestone Scientific Inc. (MLSS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
APT Alpha Pro Tech Ltd
- Price
- $5.48 -15.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $56M
- P/E Ratio
- 14.1x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
MLSS Milestone Scientific Inc.
- Market Cap
- $27M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- APT is 2.1 times larger than MLSS by market capitalization ($56M against $27M).
- APT turns 6.8% of its revenue into net income, against -35.6% for MLSS.
- MLSS carries 1.41 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.16 times for APT.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $56M | $27M |
| P/E Ratio | 14.05x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 0.86x | 7.65x |
| EPS | $0.39 | $-0.08 |
| Book Value/Share | $6.36 | $0.04 |
| Revenue/Share | $6.07 | $0.13 |
| FCF/Share | $0.57 | $-0.01 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.5% | -119.4% |
| ROA | 5.6% | -49.6% |
| ROIC | 6.4% | -154.4% |
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 70.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | -52.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | -35.6% |
| EBT Margin | 7.3% | -52.7% |
| Tax Rate | 30.0% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 17.04x | 1.85x |
| Quick Ratio | 11.18x | 1.14x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.16x | 1.41x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.16x | 2.41x |
| Interest Coverage | – | -310.1x |
| Working Capital | $51M | $4M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $6M | -$640K |
| Free Cash Flow | $6M | -$660K |
| Capital Spending | -$620K | -$20K |
| OCF Growth YoY | 10.2% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 191.2% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 9.4% | -5.7% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.0% | 0.2% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.82x | 1.40x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.1x | 1.1x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 7.8x | 579.0x |
| Days Inventory | 177 days | 332 days |
| Payables Period | 12 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $62M | $12M |
| Operating Income | $5M | -$6M |
| Net Income | $4M | -$4M |
| R&D Expense | – | $460K |
| SG&A Expense | $18M | $14M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $38M | $3M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | APT | MLSS |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 10M | 89M |
| Net Income Growth | 17.8% | – |
| EPS Growth | 21.9% | – |
APT vs MLSS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, APT or MLSS?
APT is 2.1 times larger than MLSS by market capitalization ($56M against $27M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, APT or MLSS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.