BARK vs FLWS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Bark, Inc. (BARK) and 1 800 Flowers Com Inc (FLWS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
BARK Bark, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $76M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
FLWS 1 800 Flowers Com Inc
- Market Cap
- $166M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- FLWS is 2.2 times larger than BARK by market capitalization ($166M against $76M).
- BARK turns -7.0% of its revenue into net income, against -9.3% for FLWS.
- FLWS carries 6.87 times debt per unit of equity, against 1.44 times for BARK.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Retail Stores, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $76M | $166M |
| P/B Ratio | 1.05x | 1.78x |
| EPS | $-3.00 | $-2.13 |
| Book Value/Share | $7.99 | $1.45 |
| Revenue/Share | $38.90 | $22.74 |
| FCF/Share | $0.05 | $-0.01 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -33.8% | -146.6% |
| ROA | -13.8% | -18.6% |
| ROIC | -23.9% | -39.0% |
| Gross Margin | 64.0% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.5% | -8.4% |
| Net Margin | -7.0% | -9.3% |
| EBT Margin | -7.0% | -8.4% |
| Tax Rate | 0.0% | -0.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.89x | 0.85x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.80x | 0.34x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.44x | 6.87x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.44x | 7.87x |
| Interest Coverage | -7.5x | -3.5x |
| Working Capital | $59M | -$64M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $2M | $28M |
| Free Cash Flow | $470K | -$460K |
| Capital Spending | -$1M | -$28M |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | 134.2% |
| FCF/Sales | 0.1% | -0.0% |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.3% | 1.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.99x | 2.00x |
| Receivables Turnover | 17.3x | 41.6x |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.8x | 4.3x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 24.9x | 8.5x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 21 days | 9 days |
| Days Inventory | 209 days | 85 days |
| Payables Period | 74 days | 30 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 156 days | 63 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $351M | $1.46B |
| Operating Income | -$26M | -$123M |
| Net Income | -$24M | -$136M |
| SG&A Expense | – | $542M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $127M | $907M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | BARK | FLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 9M | 64M |
BARK vs FLWS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, BARK or FLWS?
FLWS is 2.2 times larger than BARK by market capitalization ($166M against $76M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, BARK or FLWS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.