CELH vs MNST: stock comparison and AI forecast
Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc.
- Price
- $32.16 -6.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $8.14B
- P/E Ratio
- 35.3x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
MNST Monster Beverage Corp
- Price
- $45.72 +20.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $89.57B
- P/E Ratio
- 41.6x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- MNST is 11.0 times larger than CELH by market capitalization ($89.57B against $8.14B).
- CELH trades at 35.3 times trailing earnings, MNST at 41.6 times.
- Over the last six months MNST returned +20.4% and CELH -6.1%.
- MNST turns 22.7% of its revenue into net income, against 9.1% for CELH.
- CELH carries 1.66 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.21 times for MNST.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Bottled & Canned Soft Drinks & Carbonated Waters.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.14B | $89.57B |
| P/E Ratio | 35.34x | 41.56x |
| P/B Ratio | 6.38x | 9.10x |
| EPS | $0.91 | $1.10 |
| Book Value/Share | $5.04 | $5.02 |
| Revenue/Share | $13.83 | $4.89 |
| FCF/Share | $1.06 | $0.98 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 24.9% | 22.1% |
| ROA | 6.2% | 18.2% |
| ROIC | 9.8% | 27.0% |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 28.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.1% | 22.7% |
| EBT Margin | 11.2% | 29.6% |
| Tax Rate | 19.3% | 23.5% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.97x | 3.82x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.58x | 3.30x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.66x | 0.21x |
| Financial Leverage | 4.04x | 1.21x |
| Interest Coverage | 40.1x | – |
| Working Capital | $929M | $5.04B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $331M | $2.05B |
| Free Cash Flow | $269M | $1.92B |
| Capital Spending | -$62M | -$129M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -40.4% | -6.0% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -48.6% | -3.2% |
| FCF/Sales | 7.7% | 20.1% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.8% | 1.3% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.68x | 0.80x |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.2x | 4.9x |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.5x | 4.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 28.1x | 9.1x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 70 days | 75 days |
| Days Inventory | 82 days | 78 days |
| Payables Period | 43 days | 58 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 109 days | 94 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $3.50B | $9.58B |
| Operating Income | $412M | $2.73B |
| Net Income | $317M | $2.17B |
| SG&A Expense | $928M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.66B | $4.29B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CELH | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 253M | 1959M |
| Net Income Growth | 392.5% | 25.8% |
| EPS Growth | 405.6% | 25.6% |
CELH vs MNST: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CELH or MNST?
MNST is 11.0 times larger than CELH by market capitalization ($89.57B against $8.14B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, CELH or MNST?
CELH trades at 35.3 times trailing earnings, MNST at 41.6 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, CELH or MNST?
Over the last six months MNST returned +20.4% and CELH -6.1%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CELH or MNST?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.