CODQL vs HCC: stock comparison and AI forecast
Coronado Global Resources Inc. (CODQL) and Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CODQL Coronado Global Resources Inc.
- Market Cap
- $18M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
HCC Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
- Price
- $80.80 -8.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $4.27B
- P/E Ratio
- 18.7x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- HCC is 242.4 times larger than CODQL by market capitalization ($4.27B against $18M).
- HCC turns 12.5% of its revenue into net income, against -33.6% for CODQL.
- CODQL carries 9.24 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.27 times for HCC.
- HCC yields 0.41% in dividends; CODQL pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Silver Ores.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18M | $4.27B |
| P/E Ratio | – | 18.66x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.08x | 1.82x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 0.41% |
| EPS | $-4.62 | $4.33 |
| Book Value/Share | $1.36 | $44.29 |
| Revenue/Share | $12.01 | $35.23 |
| FCF/Share | $-2.05 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -297.3% | 9.9% |
| ROA | -29.0% | 7.8% |
| ROIC | – | 9.5% |
| Gross Margin | 20.8% | 31.7% |
| Operating Margin | – | 13.9% |
| Net Margin | -33.6% | 12.5% |
| EBT Margin | -33.5% | 13.7% |
| Tax Rate | -0.6% | 8.9% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.18x | 4.20x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.78x | 3.30x |
| D/E Ratio | 9.24x | 0.27x |
| Financial Leverage | 10.24x | 1.27x |
| Interest Coverage | 5.9x | 1.7x |
| Working Capital | $93M | $762M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$187M | $363M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$343M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$156M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | -281.5% | 74.9% |
| FCF/Sales | -17.0% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 7.8% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.86x | 0.63x |
| Receivables Turnover | 12.2x | 7.6x |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.7x | 5.9x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 1.4x | 1.1x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 30 days | 48 days |
| Days Inventory | 48 days | 62 days |
| Payables Period | 23 days | 21 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 54 days | 89 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $2.01B | $1.86B |
| Operating Income | – | $259M |
| Net Income | -$678M | $232M |
| SG&A Expense | $38M | $70M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.60B | $1.27B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CODQL | HCC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.33 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 7.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 168M | 53M |
| Net Income Growth | – | 485.3% |
| EPS Growth | – | 501.4% |
CODQL vs HCC: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CODQL or HCC?
HCC is 242.4 times larger than CODQL by market capitalization ($4.27B against $18M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CODQL or HCC?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.