CODQL vs METC: stock comparison and AI forecast
Coronado Global Resources Inc. (CODQL) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CODQL Coronado Global Resources Inc.
- Market Cap
- $18M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $396M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- METC is 22.5 times larger than CODQL by market capitalization ($396M against $18M).
- METC turns 10.4% of its revenue into net income, against -33.6% for CODQL.
- CODQL carries 9.24 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.83 times for METC.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Silver Ores.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18M | $396M |
| P/B Ratio | 0.08x | 1.12x |
| EPS | $-4.62 | – |
| Book Value/Share | $1.36 | $5.56 |
| Revenue/Share | $12.01 | $8.59 |
| FCF/Share | $-2.05 | $-2.91 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -297.3% | 22.1% |
| ROA | -29.0% | – |
| Gross Margin | 20.8% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | – | -10.6% |
| Net Margin | -33.6% | 10.4% |
| EBT Margin | -33.5% | -11.1% |
| Tax Rate | -0.6% | 19.6% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.18x | 3.95x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.78x | 3.07x |
| D/E Ratio | 9.24x | 0.83x |
| Financial Leverage | 10.24x | – |
| Interest Coverage | 5.9x | -7.2x |
| Working Capital | $93M | $317M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$187M | -$53M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$343M | -$184M |
| Capital Spending | -$156M | -$132M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -281.5% | -246.5% |
| FCF/Sales | -17.0% | -33.9% |
| CapEx/Sales | 7.8% | 24.2% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.86x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 12.2x | 7.1x |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.7x | 5.0x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 1.4x | 1.0x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 30 days | 52 days |
| Days Inventory | 48 days | 73 days |
| Payables Period | 23 days | 34 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 54 days | 90 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $2.01B | $545M |
| Operating Income | – | -$79M |
| Net Income | -$678M | $78M |
| SG&A Expense | $38M | $81M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $1.60B | $474M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CODQL | METC |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 168M | 63M |
| Net Income Growth | – | 0.0% |
CODQL vs METC: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CODQL or METC?
METC is 22.5 times larger than CODQL by market capitalization ($396M against $18M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CODQL or METC?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.