CQP vs SR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP) and Spire Inc (SR) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
CQP Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.
- Price
- $57.36 -9.2% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $27.77B
- P/E Ratio
- 8.5x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
SR Spire Inc
- Market Cap
- $5.24B
- P/E Ratio
- 15.7x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- CQP is 5.3 times larger than SR by market capitalization ($27.77B against $5.24B).
- CQP trades at 8.5 times trailing earnings, SR at 15.7 times.
- SR turns 15.7% of its revenue into net income, against 4.8% for CQP.
- SR yields 3.59% in dividends; CQP pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Natural Gas Distribution.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $27.77B | $5.24B |
| P/E Ratio | 8.48x | 15.69x |
| P/B Ratio | – | 1.53x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 3.59% |
| EPS | – | $5.66 |
| Book Value/Share | – | $57.92 |
| Revenue/Share | $24.10 | – |
| FCF/Share | $5.97 | $-3.77 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 10.5% |
| ROA | – | 2.4% |
| ROIC | – | 4.6% |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | – |
| Operating Margin | 29.9% | 23.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.8% | 15.7% |
| EBT Margin | 27.2% | 15.6% |
| Tax Rate | – | 17.7% |
Financial Health
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.19x | 0.55x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.07x | 0.53x |
| D/E Ratio | – | 3.29x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 4.29x |
| Interest Coverage | 4.5x | 4.8x |
| Working Capital | $256M | -$1.32B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $3.44B | $616M |
| Free Cash Flow | $2.89B | -$223M |
| Capital Spending | -$549M | -$838M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 24.7% | -23.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 14.1% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 24.8% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 4.7% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory Turnover | 35.0x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 0.8x | – |
| Days Inventory | 10 days | – |
| Payables Period | 6 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $11.67B | – |
| Operating Income | $3.98B | $546M |
| Net Income | $636M | $358M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $5.77B | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | CQP | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $3.19 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 56.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | 484M | 59M |
| Net Income Growth | 0.0% | 42.1% |
| EPS Growth | – | 43.6% |
CQP vs SR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, CQP or SR?
CQP is 5.3 times larger than SR by market capitalization ($27.77B against $5.24B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, CQP or SR?
CQP trades at 8.5 times trailing earnings, SR at 15.7 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, CQP or SR?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.