EFXT vs IR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Enerflex Ltd. (EFXT) and Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.
- Market Cap
- $2.30B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
IR Ingersoll Rand Inc.
- Price
- $82.99 +7.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $31.87B
- P/E Ratio
- 25.7x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- IR is 13.9 times larger than EFXT by market capitalization ($31.87B against $2.30B).
- IR turns 17.2% of its revenue into net income, against -1.2% for EFXT.
- EFXT carries 1.46 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.77 times for IR.
- IR yields 0.10% in dividends; EFXT pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification General Industrial Machinery & Equipment.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.30B | $31.87B |
| P/E Ratio | – | 25.69x |
| P/B Ratio | – | 3.03x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 0.10% |
| EPS | $-0.83 | $3.23 |
| Book Value/Share | – | $27.35 |
| Revenue/Share | $58.39 | $20.97 |
| FCF/Share | $5.28 | $3.95 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -10.6% | 13.2% |
| ROA | -4.3% | 7.4% |
| ROIC | 35.5% | 11.6% |
| Gross Margin | 20.4% | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 22.9% |
| Net Margin | -1.2% | 17.2% |
| EBT Margin | 1.0% | 18.5% |
| Tax Rate | 221.0% | 15.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.13x | 1.69x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.81x | 1.24x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.46x | 0.77x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.46x | 1.77x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 23.6x |
| Working Capital | $82M | $1.92B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $689M | $1.64B |
| Free Cash Flow | $643M | $1.52B |
| Capital Spending | -$46M | -$125M |
| OCF Growth YoY | – | 18.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | 8.7% |
| FCF/Sales | 9.0% | 18.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.7% | 1.6% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 3.68x | 0.43x |
| Receivables Turnover | 28.8x | 5.2x |
| Inventory Turnover | 28.2x | 3.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 97.3x | 8.9x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 13 days | 69 days |
| Days Inventory | 13 days | 100 days |
| Payables Period | – | 71 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 98 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $7.11B | $8.05B |
| Operating Income | $461M | $1.84B |
| Net Income | -$83M | $1.38B |
| SG&A Expense | $943M | $1.52B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $5.66B | $4.58B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | EFXT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.08 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 2.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | 122M | 384M |
| Net Income Growth | – | 154.1% |
| EPS Growth | – | 51.6% |
EFXT vs IR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, EFXT or IR?
IR is 13.9 times larger than EFXT by market capitalization ($31.87B against $2.30B).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, EFXT or IR?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.