ESCA vs SBDS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Escalade Inc (ESCA) and Solo Brands, Inc. (SBDS) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ESCA Escalade Inc
- Market Cap
- $283M
- P/E Ratio
- 11.8x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
SBDS Solo Brands, Inc.
- Price
- $2.99 -35.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $8M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- ESCA is 36.9 times larger than SBDS by market capitalization ($283M against $8M).
- ESCA turns 10.0% of its revenue into net income, against -28.7% for SBDS.
- SBDS carries 7.10 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.31 times for ESCA.
- ESCA yields 2.94% in dividends; SBDS pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Sporting & Athletic Goods, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $283M | $8M |
| P/E Ratio | 11.77x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 1.51x | 0.18x |
| Dividend Yield | 2.94% | – |
| EPS | $1.75 | $-50.66 |
| Book Value/Share | $13.65 | $16.49 |
| Revenue/Share | $17.57 | $116.20 |
| FCF/Share | $2.99 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.9% | -202.0% |
| ROA | 9.8% | -24.9% |
| ROIC | 16.2% | -31.4% |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | -31.6% |
| Net Margin | 10.0% | -28.7% |
| EBT Margin | 13.1% | -41.4% |
| Tax Rate | 23.4% | 6.2% |
Financial Health
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.01x | 3.12x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.50x | 1.75x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.31x | 7.10x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.31x | 8.10x |
| Interest Coverage | 62.4x | -3.1x |
| Working Capital | $104M | $92M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $45M | $38M |
| Free Cash Flow | $41M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$3M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 57.1% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 54.8% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 17.0% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.4% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.98x | 0.87x |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.1x | 10.0x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.2x | 2.1x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 10.5x | 29.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 72 days | 37 days |
| Days Inventory | 164 days | 176 days |
| Payables Period | – | 34 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 178 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $242M | $298M |
| Operating Income | $32M | -$94M |
| Net Income | $24M | -$86M |
| SG&A Expense | $46M | $165M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $173M | $124M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ESCA | SBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.61 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 34.9% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 14M | 3M |
| Net Income Growth | 91.0% | – |
| EPS Growth | 88.2% | – |
ESCA vs SBDS: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ESCA or SBDS?
ESCA is 36.9 times larger than SBDS by market capitalization ($283M against $8M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ESCA or SBDS?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.