ESE vs RSKIA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Esco Technologies Inc (ESE) and George Risk Industries, Inc. (RSKIA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
ESE Esco Technologies Inc
- Market Cap
- $5.97B
- P/E Ratio
- 17.7x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
RSKIA George Risk Industries, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $104M
- P/E Ratio
- 14.7x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- ESE is 57.6 times larger than RSKIA by market capitalization ($5.97B against $104M).
- RSKIA trades at 14.7 times trailing earnings, ESE at 17.6 times.
- RSKIA turns 38.8% of its revenue into net income, against 25.7% for ESE.
- ESE carries 0.50 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.13 times for RSKIA.
- ESE yields 0.14% in dividends; RSKIA pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Communications Equipment, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.97B | $104M |
| P/E Ratio | 17.65x | 14.72x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.69x | 1.59x |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | – |
| EPS | $13.05 | $1.44 |
| Book Value/Share | $62.42 | $13.38 |
| Revenue/Share | $47.27 | – |
| FCF/Share | $8.00 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 19.5% | 14.5% |
| ROA | 13.0% | 12.8% |
| ROIC | – | 9.8% |
| Gross Margin | 42.8% | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | – | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 25.7% | 38.8% |
| EBT Margin | 13.8% | 57.9% |
| Tax Rate | 22.2% | 23.9% |
Financial Health
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.38x | 14.58x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.94x | 11.91x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.50x | 0.13x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.50x | 1.13x |
| Interest Coverage | 13.3x | 659.0x |
| Working Capital | $209M | $66M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $244M | $6M |
| Free Cash Flow | $207M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$37M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 19.5% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 22.9% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 16.9% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 3.0% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.51x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.6x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.9x | 1.0x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 7.0x | – |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 80 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 125 days | 368 days |
| Payables Period | 61 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 144 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1.22B | – |
| Operating Income | – | $7M |
| Net Income | $315M | $9M |
| SG&A Expense | $251M | $5M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $700M | $13M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | ESE | RSKIA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.32 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 2.5% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 26M | 5M |
| Net Income Growth | 174.1% | 3.0% |
| EPS Growth | 216.8% | – |
ESE vs RSKIA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, ESE or RSKIA?
ESE is 57.6 times larger than RSKIA by market capitalization ($5.97B against $104M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, ESE or RSKIA?
RSKIA trades at 14.7 times trailing earnings, ESE at 17.6 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, ESE or RSKIA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.