FIGS vs UA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Figs, Inc. (FIGS) and Under Armour, Inc. (UA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
FIGS Figs, Inc.
- Price
- $19.82 +29.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $3.29B
- P/E Ratio
- 82.6x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
UA Under Armour, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $2.19B
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- FIGS is 1.5 times larger than UA by market capitalization ($3.29B against $2.19B).
- UA carries 1.72 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.37 times for FIGS.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Apparel & Other Finishd Prods of Fabrics & Similar Matl.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $2.19B |
| P/E Ratio | 82.58x | – |
| P/B Ratio | 7.29x | 1.51x |
| EPS | $0.24 | $-2.12 |
| Book Value/Share | $2.72 | $3.38 |
| Revenue/Share | $4.51 | $2.33 |
| FCF/Share | $0.89 | $0.94 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | -48.5% |
| ROA | – | -17.9% |
| ROIC | 15.9% | -3.1% |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | -8.6% |
| Net Margin | – | -70.2% |
| EBT Margin | 11.9% | -13.2% |
| Tax Rate | 18.8% | -430.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.39x | 1.95x |
| Quick Ratio | 3.28x | 1.01x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.37x | 1.72x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.37x | 2.72x |
| Interest Coverage | 0.2x | 1.2x |
| Working Capital | $370M | $1.09B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $161M | $343M |
| Free Cash Flow | $148M | $402M |
| Capital Spending | -$14M | $59M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 426.6% | – |
| FCF Growth YoY | 572.4% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 19.7% | 40.1% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.8% | 5.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.21x | 0.25x |
| Receivables Turnover | 107.5x | 1.5x |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.9x | 0.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 20.7x | 1.8x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 3 days | 240 days |
| Days Inventory | 189 days | 626 days |
| Payables Period | 22 days | 312 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 171 days | 554 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $749M | $1.00B |
| Operating Income | $81M | -$87M |
| Net Income | – | -$704M |
| SG&A Expense | $323M | $345M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $234M | $628M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | FIGS | UA |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 166M | 430M |
| EPS Growth | 242.9% | – |
FIGS vs UA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, FIGS or UA?
FIGS is 1.5 times larger than UA by market capitalization ($3.29B against $2.19B).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, FIGS or UA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.