GLXZ vs NOMA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Galaxy Gaming, Inc. (GLXZ) and Nomadar Corp. (NOMA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
GLXZ Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
- Price
- $1.62 -14.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $41M
- P/E Ratio
- 27.0x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
NOMA Nomadar Corp.
- Market Cap
- $23M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- GLXZ is 1.8 times larger than NOMA by market capitalization ($41M against $23M).
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Services-Amusement & Recreation Services.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $41M | $23M |
| P/E Ratio | 27.01x | – |
| P/B Ratio | – | 1.69x |
| EPS | $0.06 | $-0.22 |
| Book Value/Share | – | $0.76 |
| Revenue/Share | $1.25 | $0.04 |
| FCF/Share | $0.30 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| ROIC | 41.8% | -26.9% |
| Gross Margin | 98.2% | – |
| Operating Margin | 26.7% | -263.9% |
| EBT Margin | 16.1% | -342.4% |
| Tax Rate | 2.2% | – |
Financial Health
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.54x | 1.13x |
| D/E Ratio | – | 0.37x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 1.37x |
| Interest Coverage | 2.7x | -36.1x |
| Working Capital | $4M | $640K |
Cash Flow
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $8M | -$2M |
| Free Cash Flow | $7M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$100K | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 64.5% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 23.8% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.3% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.16x | 0.04x |
| Receivables Turnover | 6.4x | 2.3x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 228.4x | 0.1x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 57 days | 157 days |
| Payables Period | 1059 days | 911 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $31M | $680K |
| Operating Income | $8M | -$4M |
| R&D Expense | $610K | – |
| SG&A Expense | $18M | – |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $550K | $560K |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | GLXZ | NOMA |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 25M | 18M |
GLXZ vs NOMA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, GLXZ or NOMA?
GLXZ is 1.8 times larger than NOMA by market capitalization ($41M against $23M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, GLXZ or NOMA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.