GRC vs XYL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Gorman Rupp Co (GRC) and Xylem Inc. (XYL) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
GRC Gorman Rupp Co
- Market Cap
- $1.79B
- P/E Ratio
- 26.2x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
XYL Xylem Inc.
- Market Cap
- $22.94B
- P/E Ratio
- 19.2x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- XYL is 12.8 times larger than GRC by market capitalization ($22.94B against $1.79B).
- XYL trades at 19.2 times trailing earnings, GRC at 26.2 times.
- XYL turns 11.9% of its revenue into net income, against 10.2% for GRC.
- GRC carries 0.91 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.66 times for XYL.
- XYL yields 1.77% in dividends and GRC 1.12%.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Pumps & Pumping Equipment.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.79B | $22.94B |
| P/E Ratio | 26.16x | 19.20x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.88x | 2.23x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.77% |
| EPS | $2.59 | $5.21 |
| Book Value/Share | $17.46 | $44.78 |
| Revenue/Share | $27.36 | $39.50 |
| FCF/Share | $4.18 | $4.02 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.0% | 10.5% |
| ROA | 8.4% | 6.2% |
| ROIC | 14.9% | 9.5% |
| Gross Margin | 32.5% | 39.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 15.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 11.9% |
| EBT Margin | 13.2% | 14.8% |
| Tax Rate | 22.7% | 20.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.70x | 1.39x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.82x | 1.02x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.91x | 0.66x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.91x | 1.69x |
| Interest Coverage | 3.1x | 38.5x |
| Working Capital | $165M | $1.11B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $130M | $1.27B |
| Free Cash Flow | $110M | $921M |
| Capital Spending | -$20M | -$351M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 29.3% | -0.1% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 31.5% | -0.4% |
| FCF/Sales | 15.3% | 10.2% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.7% | 3.9% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.82x | 0.52x |
| Receivables Turnover | 6.6x | 4.6x |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.7x | 5.2x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 5.4x | 7.5x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 55 days | 79 days |
| Days Inventory | 64 days | 70 days |
| Payables Period | 26 days | 71 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 93 days | 79 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $722M | $9.06B |
| Operating Income | $117M | $1.37B |
| Net Income | $74M | $1.08B |
| R&D Expense | – | $231M |
| SG&A Expense | $106M | $1.92B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $488M | $5.45B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | GRC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.76 | $1.77 |
| Payout Ratio | 29.3% | 34.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | 26M | 229M |
| Net Income Growth | 46.7% | 14.1% |
| EPS Growth | – | 36.4% |
GRC vs XYL: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, GRC or XYL?
XYL is 12.8 times larger than GRC by market capitalization ($22.94B against $1.79B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, GRC or XYL?
XYL trades at 19.2 times trailing earnings, GRC at 26.2 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, GRC or XYL?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.