GWRS vs PCYO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Global Water Resources, Inc. (GWRS) and Pure Cycle Corp (PCYO) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
GWRS Global Water Resources, Inc.
- Price
- $7.28 +1.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $210M
- P/E Ratio
- 91.0x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
PCYO Pure Cycle Corp
- Market Cap
- $258M
- P/E Ratio
- 18.8x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- PCYO is 1.2 times larger than GWRS by market capitalization ($258M against $210M).
- PCYO trades at 18.8 times trailing earnings, GWRS at 91.0 times.
- PCYO turns 43.7% of its revenue into net income, against 4.7% for GWRS.
- GWRS carries 3.21 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.16 times for PCYO.
- GWRS yields 4.19% in dividends; PCYO pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Water Supply.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $210M | $258M |
| P/E Ratio | 90.99x | 18.79x |
| P/B Ratio | 2.71x | 1.70x |
| Dividend Yield | 4.19% | – |
| EPS | $0.08 | $0.57 |
| Book Value/Share | $2.68 | $6.29 |
| Revenue/Share | $2.11 | $1.40 |
| FCF/Share | $-0.65 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.1% | 9.7% |
| ROA | – | 8.4% |
| ROIC | – | 7.7% |
| Gross Margin | – | 62.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 43.7% |
| EBT Margin | 6.5% | 58.2% |
| Tax Rate | 25.3% | 25.0% |
Financial Health
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.77x | 1.53x |
| D/E Ratio | 3.21x | 0.16x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 1.16x |
| Interest Coverage | 1.4x | 13.5x |
| Working Capital | -$5M | $5M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $19M | $8M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$19M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$38M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | -20.0% | 12.4% |
| FCF/Sales | -30.8% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 61.6% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 0.19x |
| Receivables Turnover | 15.5x | 13.6x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 24 days | 27 days |
| Payables Period | – | 76 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $61M | $34M |
| Operating Income | $8M | $13M |
| Net Income | $2M | $15M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | – | $13M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | GWRS | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.30 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 375.0% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 29M | 24M |
| Net Income Growth | 6.7% | 8.2% |
| EPS Growth | -55.6% | 26.7% |
GWRS vs PCYO: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, GWRS or PCYO?
PCYO is 1.2 times larger than GWRS by market capitalization ($258M against $210M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, GWRS or PCYO?
PCYO trades at 18.8 times trailing earnings, GWRS at 91.0 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, GWRS or PCYO?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.