KMX vs RUSHA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Carmax Inc (KMX) and Rush Enterprises Inc \Tx\ (RUSHA) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
KMX Carmax Inc
- Market Cap
- $7.47B
- P/E Ratio
- 24.7x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
RUSHA Rush Enterprises Inc \Tx\
- Price
- $45.32 -4.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $5.29B
- P/E Ratio
- 13.8x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- KMX is 1.4 times larger than RUSHA by market capitalization ($7.47B against $5.29B).
- RUSHA trades at 13.8 times trailing earnings, KMX at 24.7 times.
- KMX carries 3.13 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.99 times for RUSHA.
- RUSHA yields 1.13% in dividends; KMX pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Retail-Auto Dealers & Gasoline Stations.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $7.47B | $5.29B |
| P/E Ratio | 24.70x | 13.82x |
| P/B Ratio | 1.18x | 2.27x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 1.13% |
| EPS | $2.13 | $3.28 |
| Book Value/Share | $44.42 | $19.97 |
| Revenue/Share | $194.67 | $61.99 |
| FCF/Share | $8.07 | $2.99 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 11.4% |
| ROA | – | 5.7% |
| ROIC | – | 12.1% |
| Gross Margin | 10.3% | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | – | 5.1% |
| Net Margin | – | 3.7% |
| EBT Margin | 1.6% | 4.7% |
| Tax Rate | 35.7% | 20.9% |
Financial Health
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.33x | 1.45x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.57x | 0.38x |
| D/E Ratio | 3.13x | 0.99x |
| Financial Leverage | 4.13x | 2.00x |
| Interest Coverage | – | 13.4x |
| Working Capital | $2.91B | $714M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.60B | $674M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.15B | $348M |
| Capital Spending | -$453M | -$326M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 32.4% | -23.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -41.2% | -13.4% |
| FCF/Sales | 4.2% | 4.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.6% | 4.5% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.06x | 1.55x |
| Receivables Turnover | 123.0x | 23.8x |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.4x | 3.4x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 6.8x | 4.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 3 days | 15 days |
| Days Inventory | 57 days | 106 days |
| Payables Period | 15 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 45 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $27.63B | $7.24B |
| Operating Income | – | $371M |
| Net Income | – | $265M |
| SG&A Expense | $2.46B | $984M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $24.78B | $5.81B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | KMX | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.51 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 15.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 142M | 117M |
| Net Income Growth | – | -7.5% |
| EPS Growth | -51.4% | – |
KMX vs RUSHA: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, KMX or RUSHA?
KMX is 1.4 times larger than RUSHA by market capitalization ($7.47B against $5.29B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, KMX or RUSHA?
RUSHA trades at 13.8 times trailing earnings, KMX at 24.7 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, KMX or RUSHA?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.