KRT vs SWIM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Karat Packaging Inc. (KRT) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
KRT Karat Packaging Inc.
- Market Cap
- $669M
- P/E Ratio
- 11.7x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
SWIM Latham Group, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $924M
- P/E Ratio
- 65.4x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- SWIM is 1.4 times larger than KRT by market capitalization ($924M against $669M).
- KRT trades at 11.7 times trailing earnings, SWIM at 65.4 times.
- KRT turns 9.4% of its revenue into net income, against 1.3% for SWIM.
- SWIM carries 1.10 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.83 times for KRT.
- KRT yields 5.44% in dividends; SWIM pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Plastics Products, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $669M | $924M |
| P/E Ratio | 11.65x | 65.41x |
| P/B Ratio | 4.10x | 2.18x |
| Dividend Yield | 5.44% | – |
| EPS | $2.88 | $0.12 |
| Book Value/Share | $8.19 | $3.61 |
| Revenue/Share | $25.27 | $6.02 |
| FCF/Share | $3.23 | $0.40 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 29.0% | 2.2% |
| ROA | 15.4% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 29.5% | 4.0% |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 4.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 1.3% |
| EBT Margin | 12.7% | 1.3% |
| Tax Rate | 23.8% | 1.3% |
Financial Health
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.83x | 2.38x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.91x | 1.63x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.83x | 1.10x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.88x | 2.10x |
| Interest Coverage | 13.6x | 3.1x |
| Working Capital | $87M | $160M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $65M | $78M |
| Free Cash Flow | $64M | $46M |
| Capital Spending | -$910K | -$31M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 144.8% | 68.3% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 148.2% | 94.8% |
| FCF/Sales | 12.8% | 6.6% |
| CapEx/Sales | 0.2% | 4.4% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.64x | 0.79x |
| Receivables Turnover | 11.2x | 9.0x |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.1x | 4.6x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 6.7x | 5.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 33 days | 41 days |
| Days Inventory | 118 days | 80 days |
| Payables Period | – | 33 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | – | 88 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $504M | $708M |
| Operating Income | $59M | $31M |
| Net Income | $47M | $9M |
| SG&A Expense | $144M | $141M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $300M | $395M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | KRT | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $1.82 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 63.2% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 20M | 118M |
| Net Income Growth | 56.1% | – |
| EPS Growth | 105.7% | – |
KRT vs SWIM: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, KRT or SWIM?
SWIM is 1.4 times larger than KRT by market capitalization ($924M against $669M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, KRT or SWIM?
KRT trades at 11.7 times trailing earnings, SWIM at 65.4 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, KRT or SWIM?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.