LMAT vs UFPT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Lemaitre Vascular Inc (LMAT) and Ufp Technologies Inc (UFPT) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
LMAT Lemaitre Vascular Inc
- Price
- $80.89 -25.0% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $1.85B
- P/E Ratio
- 31.6x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
UFPT Ufp Technologies Inc
- Price
- $303.47 +37.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $2.35B
- P/E Ratio
- 31.0x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- UFPT is 1.3 times larger than LMAT by market capitalization ($2.35B against $1.85B).
- UFPT trades at 31.0 times trailing earnings, LMAT at 31.6 times.
- Over the last six months UFPT returned +37.1% and LMAT -25.0%.
- LMAT turns 23.5% of its revenue into net income, against 11.8% for UFPT.
- LMAT carries 0.52 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.41 times for UFPT.
- LMAT yields 1.17% in dividends; UFPT pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.85B | $2.35B |
| P/E Ratio | 31.60x | 31.01x |
| P/B Ratio | 4.28x | 4.84x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | – |
| EPS | $2.56 | $9.78 |
| Book Value/Share | $18.90 | $62.71 |
| Revenue/Share | $11.78 | $83.85 |
| FCF/Share | $2.93 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.7% | 15.8% |
| ROA | 9.7% | 11.2% |
| ROIC | 12.0% | 16.6% |
| Gross Margin | 72.0% | 28.9% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 15.5% |
| Net Margin | 23.5% | 11.8% |
| EBT Margin | 30.4% | 14.4% |
| Tax Rate | 22.6% | 18.3% |
Financial Health
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 14.60x | 2.98x |
| Quick Ratio | 13.63x | 1.71x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.52x | 0.41x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.52x | 1.41x |
| Interest Coverage | 13.6x | 18.3x |
| Working Capital | $471M | $153M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $76M | $74M |
| Free Cash Flow | $67M | – |
| Capital Spending | -$9M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | 4.0% | -25.4% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 1.2% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 24.9% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 3.4% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.41x | 0.95x |
| Receivables Turnover | 7.5x | 6.7x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.2x | 4.7x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 8.8x | 8.3x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 49 days | 55 days |
| Days Inventory | 163 days | 78 days |
| Payables Period | 20 days | 21 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 191 days | 111 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $269M | $650M |
| Operating Income | $75M | $101M |
| Net Income | $63M | $77M |
| R&D Expense | $17M | – |
| SG&A Expense | $119M | $88M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $75M | $462M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | LMAT | UFPT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.95 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 37.1% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 23M | 8M |
| Net Income Growth | 18.8% | 14.0% |
| EPS Growth | -8.2% | 13.6% |
LMAT vs UFPT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, LMAT or UFPT?
UFPT is 1.3 times larger than LMAT by market capitalization ($2.35B against $1.85B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, LMAT or UFPT?
UFPT trades at 31.0 times trailing earnings, LMAT at 31.6 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, LMAT or UFPT?
Over the last six months UFPT returned +37.1% and LMAT -25.0%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, LMAT or UFPT?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.