NINE vs TUSK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
NINE Nine Energy Service, Inc.
- Price
- $7.44 -24.5% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $104M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
- Price
- $3.11 +32.3% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $150M
- P/E Ratio
- 8.4x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- TUSK is 1.4 times larger than NINE by market capitalization ($150M against $104M).
- Over the last six months TUSK returned +32.3% and NINE -24.5%.
- NINE carries 1.45 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.30 times for TUSK.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $104M | $150M |
| P/E Ratio | – | 8.41x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.80x | 0.57x |
| EPS | $-1.35 | $0.37 |
| Book Value/Share | $9.29 | $5.46 |
| Revenue/Share | $29.10 | $0.42 |
| FCF/Share | $-2.18 | $-2.97 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 5.1% |
| ROA | – | 3.9% |
| ROIC | -3.9% | -4.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -53.3% |
| Net Margin | – | 67.1% |
| EBT Margin | -9.4% | -29.4% |
| Tax Rate | -1.2% | -92.7% |
Financial Health
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.34x | 1.50x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.68x | 1.30x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.45x | 0.30x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.45x | 1.30x |
| Interest Coverage | -34.5x | -3.8x |
| Working Capital | $98M | $36M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$17M | -$19M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$30M | -$143M |
| Capital Spending | -$14M | -$123M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -220.7% | -114.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | – | -275.1% |
| FCF/Sales | -7.5% | -712.6% |
| CapEx/Sales | 3.4% | 615.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.28x | 0.06x |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.4x | 0.5x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 3.8x | 0.1x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 82 days | 702 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $406M | $20M |
| Operating Income | -$10M | -$11M |
| Net Income | – | $13M |
| SG&A Expense | – | $14M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | NINE | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 14M | 48M |
NINE vs TUSK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, NINE or TUSK?
TUSK is 1.4 times larger than NINE by market capitalization ($150M against $104M).
Which stock performed better over the last six months, NINE or TUSK?
Over the last six months TUSK returned +32.3% and NINE -24.5%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, NINE or TUSK?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.