OBIO vs OSUR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Orchestra Biomed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO) and Orasure Technologies Inc (OSUR) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
OBIO Orchestra Biomed Holdings, Inc.
- Market Cap
- $341M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
OSUR Orasure Technologies Inc
- Price
- $3.37 +7.7% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $232M
- P/E Ratio
- –
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- OBIO is 1.5 times larger than OSUR by market capitalization ($341M against $232M).
- OSUR turns -43.7% of its revenue into net income, against -184.6% for OBIO.
- OBIO carries 4.47 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.13 times for OSUR.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $341M | $232M |
| P/B Ratio | 17.67x | 0.73x |
| EPS | $-0.99 | $-0.59 |
| Book Value/Share | $0.32 | $4.61 |
| Revenue/Share | $0.53 | $1.63 |
| FCF/Share | $-0.98 | $-0.70 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | -305.5% | -15.5% |
| ROA | -51.0% | -13.6% |
| ROIC | -56.7% | -16.1% |
| Gross Margin | 99.5% | 42.6% |
| Operating Margin | -181.4% | -48.1% |
| Net Margin | -184.6% | -43.7% |
| EBT Margin | -181.4% | -41.7% |
| Tax Rate | – | 0.3% |
Financial Health
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 8.26x | 8.88x |
| Quick Ratio | 8.24x | 7.68x |
| D/E Ratio | 4.47x | 0.13x |
| Financial Leverage | 5.99x | 1.13x |
| Interest Coverage | -56.1x | -129.6x |
| Working Capital | $98M | $198M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | -$58M | -$43M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$59M | -$48M |
| Capital Spending | -$780K | -$5M |
| FCF/Sales | -184.8% | -42.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.4% | 4.6% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.28x | 0.31x |
| Receivables Turnover | 627.0x | 4.4x |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.6x | 2.1x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 15.6x | 2.9x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 1 days | 83 days |
| Days Inventory | 581 days | 170 days |
| Payables Period | 14256 days | 48 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | -13674 days | 206 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $32M | $112M |
| Operating Income | -$58M | -$54M |
| Net Income | -$59M | -$49M |
| R&D Expense | $63M | $45M |
| SG&A Expense | $27M | $95M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $160K | $65M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | OBIO | OSUR |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 60M | 69M |
OBIO vs OSUR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, OBIO or OSUR?
OBIO is 1.5 times larger than OSUR by market capitalization ($341M against $232M).
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, OBIO or OSUR?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.