PI vs VRT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Impinj Inc (PI) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
PI Impinj Inc
- Price
- $161.06 +6.4% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $4.97B
- P/E Ratio
- 732.1x
- Size
- mid-cap
- AI Forecast
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co
- Market Cap
- $70.41B
- P/E Ratio
- 38.3x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- VRT is 14.2 times larger than PI by market capitalization ($70.41B against $4.97B).
- VRT trades at 38.3 times trailing earnings, PI at 732.1 times.
- VRT carries 2.30 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.81 times for PI.
- VRT yields 0.14% in dividends; PI pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Electronic Components, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.97B | $70.41B |
| P/E Ratio | 732.08x | 38.26x |
| P/B Ratio | 16.44x | 12.80x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 0.14% |
| EPS | $0.22 | $4.78 |
| Book Value/Share | $9.80 | $14.29 |
| Revenue/Share | $12.56 | $34.06 |
| FCF/Share | $2.13 | $8.11 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 38.1% |
| ROA | – | 11.5% |
| ROIC | -0.5% | 27.9% |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | – | 16.0% |
| EBT Margin | -2.4% | 19.9% |
| Tax Rate | -1.6% | 19.8% |
Financial Health
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.42x | 1.39x |
| Quick Ratio | 7.07x | 1.01x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.81x | 2.30x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.81x | 3.30x |
| Interest Coverage | 7.7x | 153.7x |
| Working Capital | $299M | $3.41B |
Cash Flow
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $76M | $3.64B |
| Free Cash Flow | $66M | $3.12B |
| Capital Spending | -$11M | -$518M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 35.7% | 133.3% |
| FCF Growth YoY | 61.0% | 127.4% |
| FCF/Sales | 16.9% | 23.8% |
| CapEx/Sales | 2.8% | 4.0% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.71x | 0.72x |
| Receivables Turnover | 5.0x | 3.0x |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.2x | 2.5x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 8.0x | 9.9x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 74 days | 122 days |
| Days Inventory | 169 days | 148 days |
| Payables Period | 27 days | 146 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 215 days | 124 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $388M | $13.12B |
| Operating Income | -$3M | $2.64B |
| Net Income | – | $2.10B |
| R&D Expense | $116M | – |
| SG&A Expense | $210M | $1.97B |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $180M | $8.12B |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | PI | VRT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.25 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 5.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | 31M | 385M |
| Net Income Growth | – | 102.9% |
| EPS Growth | – | 79.0% |
PI vs VRT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, PI or VRT?
VRT is 14.2 times larger than PI by market capitalization ($70.41B against $4.97B).
Which is cheaper on earnings, PI or VRT?
VRT trades at 38.3 times trailing earnings, PI at 732.1 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, PI or VRT?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.