PUMP vs RNGR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Propetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
PUMP Propetro Holding Corp.
- Price
- $6.39 -58.9% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $785M
- P/E Ratio
- 33.6x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
- Price
- $12.66 -20.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $296M
- P/E Ratio
- 20.1x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- PUMP is 2.6 times larger than RNGR by market capitalization ($785M against $296M).
- RNGR trades at 20.1 times trailing earnings, PUMP at 33.6 times.
- Over the last six months RNGR returned -20.1% and PUMP -58.9%.
- PUMP carries 0.56 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.53 times for RNGR.
- RNGR yields 1.42% in dividends; PUMP pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $785M | $296M |
| P/E Ratio | 33.63x | 20.10x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.95x | 0.99x |
| Dividend Yield | – | 1.42% |
| EPS | $0.19 | $0.63 |
| Book Value/Share | $6.75 | $12.84 |
| Revenue/Share | $9.94 | $24.39 |
| FCF/Share | $-0.78 | $0.76 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | – | 4.9% |
| ROA | – | 3.2% |
| ROIC | – | 5.4% |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 17.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | – | 2.6% |
| EBT Margin | 0.4% | 3.7% |
| Tax Rate | 60.2% | 31.0% |
Financial Health
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.49x | 1.66x |
| Quick Ratio | 3.41x | 1.63x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.56x | 0.53x |
| Financial Leverage | – | 1.53x |
| Interest Coverage | 3.6x | 12.8x |
| Working Capital | $760M | $63M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $196M | $55M |
| Free Cash Flow | -$96M | $18M |
| Capital Spending | -$292M | -$37M |
| OCF Growth YoY | 4.1% | -33.8% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -349.4% | -63.1% |
| FCF/Sales | -7.9% | 3.1% |
| CapEx/Sales | 23.9% | 6.5% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | – | 1.24x |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.2x | 4.8x |
| Inventory Turnover | 35.9x | 152.2x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 1.2x | 2.2x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 87 days | 76 days |
| Days Inventory | 10 days | 2 days |
| Payables Period | 67 days | 18 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 30 days | 61 days |
Income Statement
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $1.22B | $571M |
| Operating Income | $6M | $20M |
| Net Income | – | $15M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $930M | $472M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | PUMP | RNGR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | – | $0.18 |
| Payout Ratio | – | 28.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | 123M | 23M |
| Net Income Growth | – | -25.8% |
| EPS Growth | – | -27.6% |
PUMP vs RNGR: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, PUMP or RNGR?
PUMP is 2.6 times larger than RNGR by market capitalization ($785M against $296M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, PUMP or RNGR?
RNGR trades at 20.1 times trailing earnings, PUMP at 33.6 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, PUMP or RNGR?
Over the last six months RNGR returned -20.1% and PUMP -58.9%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, PUMP or RNGR?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.