RNGR vs TUSK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Ranger Energy Services, Inc. (RNGR) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
RNGR Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
- Price
- $12.66 -20.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $296M
- P/E Ratio
- 20.1x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
- Price
- $3.11 +32.3% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $150M
- P/E Ratio
- 8.4x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Six-month price performance
Closing prices rebased to 100 at the start of the window.
Key facts
- RNGR is 2.0 times larger than TUSK by market capitalization ($296M against $150M).
- TUSK trades at 8.4 times trailing earnings, RNGR at 20.1 times.
- Over the last six months TUSK returned +32.3% and RNGR -20.1%.
- TUSK turns 67.1% of its revenue into net income, against 2.6% for RNGR.
- RNGR carries 0.53 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.30 times for TUSK.
- RNGR yields 1.42% in dividends; TUSK pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $296M | $150M |
| P/E Ratio | 20.10x | 8.41x |
| P/B Ratio | 0.99x | 0.57x |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | – |
| EPS | $0.63 | $0.37 |
| Book Value/Share | $12.84 | $5.46 |
| Revenue/Share | $24.39 | $0.42 |
| FCF/Share | $0.76 | $-2.97 |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| ROA | 3.2% | 3.9% |
| ROIC | 5.4% | -4.0% |
| Gross Margin | 17.3% | – |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | -53.3% |
| Net Margin | 2.6% | 67.1% |
| EBT Margin | 3.7% | -29.4% |
| Tax Rate | 31.0% | -92.7% |
Financial Health
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.66x | 1.50x |
| Quick Ratio | 1.63x | 1.30x |
| D/E Ratio | 0.53x | 0.30x |
| Financial Leverage | 1.53x | 1.30x |
| Interest Coverage | 12.8x | -3.8x |
| Working Capital | $63M | $36M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $55M | -$19M |
| Free Cash Flow | $18M | -$143M |
| Capital Spending | -$37M | -$123M |
| OCF Growth YoY | -33.8% | -114.7% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -63.1% | -275.1% |
| FCF/Sales | 3.1% | -712.6% |
| CapEx/Sales | 6.5% | 615.7% |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 1.24x | 0.06x |
| Receivables Turnover | 4.8x | 0.5x |
| Inventory Turnover | 152.2x | – |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 2.2x | 0.1x |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 76 days | 702 days |
| Days Inventory | 2 days | – |
| Payables Period | 18 days | – |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 61 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $571M | $20M |
| Operating Income | $20M | -$11M |
| Net Income | $15M | $13M |
| SG&A Expense | – | $14M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $472M | – |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | RNGR | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $0.18 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 28.6% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 23M | 48M |
| Net Income Growth | -25.8% | – |
| EPS Growth | -27.6% | – |
RNGR vs TUSK: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, RNGR or TUSK?
RNGR is 2.0 times larger than TUSK by market capitalization ($296M against $150M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, RNGR or TUSK?
TUSK trades at 8.4 times trailing earnings, RNGR at 20.1 times.
Which stock performed better over the last six months, RNGR or TUSK?
Over the last six months TUSK returned +32.3% and RNGR -20.1%.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, RNGR or TUSK?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.