HON vs TATT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Honeywell International Inc (HON) and Tat Technologies Ltd (TATT) compared on price performance, valuation, profitability and the daily AI forecast. · Alpha · vs market
Share
HON Honeywell International Inc
- Price
- $215.78 -0.1% · 6M
- Market Cap
- $68.48B
- P/E Ratio
- 9.7x
- Size
- large-cap
- AI Forecast
TATT Tat Technologies Ltd
- Market Cap
- $480M
- P/E Ratio
- 22.9x
- Size
- small-cap
- AI Forecast
Which one does the AI model favor?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
Key facts
- HON is 142.6 times larger than TATT by market capitalization ($68.48B against $480M).
- HON trades at 9.7 times trailing earnings, TATT at 22.9 times.
- HON turns 23.0% of its revenue into net income, against 9.1% for TATT.
- HON carries 1.36 times debt per unit of equity, against 0.29 times for TATT.
- HON yields 6.07% in dividends; TATT pays none.
- Both companies share the SEC industry classification Aircraft Engines & Engine Parts.
Fundamentals side by side
Trailing twelve months.
Valuation & Market
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $68.48B | $480M |
| P/E Ratio | 9.68x | 22.85x |
| P/B Ratio | 3.05x | 2.72x |
| Dividend Yield | 6.07% | – |
| EPS | $22.30 | $1.62 |
| Book Value/Share | $70.64 | $13.59 |
| Revenue/Share | $96.79 | – |
| FCF/Share | $4.79 | – |
Profitability & Margins
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE | 31.5% | 11.1% |
| ROA | 13.3% | 8.7% |
| ROIC | 17.3% | 11.4% |
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 24.2% |
| Operating Margin | 21.4% | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | 23.0% | 9.1% |
| EBT Margin | 27.6% | 10.1% |
| Tax Rate | 19.5% | 10.1% |
Financial Health
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.96x | 4.89x |
| Quick Ratio | 0.82x | 2.67x |
| D/E Ratio | 1.36x | 0.29x |
| Financial Leverage | 2.37x | 1.29x |
| Interest Coverage | 0.8x | 17.9x |
| Working Capital | -$595M | $132M |
Cash Flow
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash Flow | $1.95B | $14M |
| Free Cash Flow | $1.52B | – |
| Capital Spending | -$427M | – |
| OCF Growth YoY | -74.0% | 2834.2% |
| FCF Growth YoY | -75.3% | – |
| FCF/Sales | 5.0% | – |
| CapEx/Sales | 1.4% | – |
Operational Efficiency
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Asset Turnover | 0.58x | – |
| Receivables Turnover | 6.0x | – |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.3x | 2.2x |
| Fixed Assets Turnover | 11.7x | – |
| Days Sales Outstanding | 60 days | – |
| Days Inventory | 39 days | 168 days |
| Payables Period | 69 days | 29 days |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 31 days | – |
Income Statement
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Revenue | $30.72B | – |
| Operating Income | $6.59B | $22M |
| Net Income | $7.05B | $20M |
| R&D Expense | $1.65B | $2M |
| SG&A Expense | $5.06B | $32M |
| Cost of Goods Sold | $19.03B | $164M |
Dividend & Shareholder Information
| Metric | HON | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividends Per Share | $13.09 | – |
| Payout Ratio | 58.7% | – |
| Shares Outstanding | 317M | 13M |
| Net Income Growth | 15.1% | – |
| EPS Growth | 135.0% | – |
HON vs TATT: stock comparison and AI forecast
Which is bigger, HON or TATT?
HON is 142.6 times larger than TATT by market capitalization ($68.48B against $480M).
Which is cheaper on earnings, HON or TATT?
HON trades at 9.7 times trailing earnings, TATT at 22.9 times.
Which one does Intratio's AI model rank higher, HON or TATT?
Intratio's model scores both stocks every trading day. Sign in to see their current direction; the exact ratings and forecasts come with a plan or a free follow slot.
More comparisons
This analysis is generated automatically using our proprietary AI systems and should not be considered personalized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consider consulting a financial advisor before making investment decisions.